I've been typing about some different authors' methods of starting novels lately. If you'd like to read about how Zilpha Keatley Snyder, author of the great "tweens" book The Egypt Game, does it, here's where to go. Her site also has an autobiography and some ways to get your hands on her books.
Page Summary
ladyjaguar.livejournal.com - (no subject)- (Anonymous) - Yes, THAT Edd Vick
Style Credit
- Style: Neutral Good for Practicality by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2004-11-19 11:01 am (UTC)The only thing I've read of Snyder's is the three Greensky books, and I enjoyed them. And we had the "Below the Root" computer game. Probably still have it around here somewhere, though I doubt we can play it anymore because it was a DOS-based game. It was fun, though. The girls enjoyed it, and Keys and I liked playing it, too.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-19 11:36 am (UTC)I think _Egypt Game_ is Snyder's best. But then I discovered the book at exactly the right age. I was in fifth grade and reading through the Newbery novel shelf. It makes you want to go out and have an Egypt game of your own. But there's also a good storyline . . . there's a Boo Radley-like character who helps the main character get rescued when she does something rash at the end of the book. I recently took a look at the copy I found at Half Price Books (my original was lost in Mother's house fire, if she hadn't already purged it) and noticed that it is in an omniscient viewpoint. Now you don't see that too often, because intimate close-in viewpoint of the main character is "in style." (And it turns out that I do best in that viewpoint, so that's a lucky break.) But if anyone ever wants to see how to do omniscient without having authorial intrusion, it'd be good for them to take a look at _Egypt Game_.
There are a bunch of bogus reviews of that book on Amazon. It made me mad. They're from a disgruntled class of ignorami who were made to read the book and told they'd get extra credit if they posted reviews. I've already complained to Amazon about the one that says "this book has too much content for its own good" (I deleted the apostrophe that the idiot put in "its"), but they came back saying it would be "censorship" to remove vapid, bogus, obviously-didn't-read-it stuff. Feh! Censorship, nothin'. They're just lazy.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-19 04:20 pm (UTC)I don't worry too much about the Amazon reviews. Booking Hawaii Five-0 got generally good ones except for one from a guy who was disappointed that it wasn't a personality piece with interviews with the stars. I took the time to explain to him that I consciously selected and "arm's-length" historical view rather than the personality-fluff route. He also referred to the book as "nothing more than a glorified episode guide." I pretty much explained that yes, it is an episode guide -- that's why the subtitle is "An Episode Guide and Critical History." And I was happy he had called it "glorified." (grin)
Yes, THAT Edd Vick
Date: 2004-11-19 02:51 pm (UTC)You posted a comment on my wife's LJ. Yep, I'm the same me I was back at SMU. Email me at edd@speakeasy.net to catch up, if you'd like.
And I'm lovin' your blog! To reply downtopic, I love the Dortmunder books. It's fine to have a baddie as the protagonist, so long as they've got something admirable, even tenaciousness (viz all those horror movies).
-Edd