RANT: the IMDB
Oct. 26th, 2007 04:52 am*grrr* I helped fill in the fields back when the iMDB (Internet Movie Database) was all text and we had to use a rudimentary browser like Lynx to access webpages. Users filled in many of these reviews. And now what? I find that I can't read a movie's page without getting redirected to several stupid ads that play before you can get to the next subpage! And you have to register now to read the user comments! This is ridiculous. Users made that database, and now somebody owns it and is selling ads! *grump*
Typical of the world. Still, it's irritating.
I typed text for Project Gutenberg years and years ago when I was a FidoNet sysop-ette, too. They're still kicking as a freeware project, at least as far as I can tell. But they're among the few/the proud that still are.
What happened to collaborative efforts that weren't intended to make money?
Typical of the world. Still, it's irritating.
I typed text for Project Gutenberg years and years ago when I was a FidoNet sysop-ette, too. They're still kicking as a freeware project, at least as far as I can tell. But they're among the few/the proud that still are.
What happened to collaborative efforts that weren't intended to make money?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 11:55 am (UTC)There are lots of collaborative efforts -- Wikipedia, for one -- that aren't commercial (although they do TAKE money, because they cost to maintain). (I should note that I have no association with Wikipedia, and lots of gripes with it, but it's still a worthwhile project.)
That NaNo-whatever
Date: 2007-10-26 03:24 pm (UTC)And despite the fact that they mention that quality doesn't count, only quantity, apparently a few people have received publishing offers from NYC houses, prestige mags, etc.
Did I tell you that I entered RBT in the Amazon contest after all? Took your advice. (See? How could you be "unworthy" when you can motivate others in a positive way?)
Hoping things have become more tranquil down there.
Working away at COLOR RADIO, but for some reason I hate it. Probably because living through so much of that stuff once was more than enough.
It should be a trilogy, I suspect. Or a blazing bonfire.
Re: That NaNo-whatever
Date: 2007-10-26 03:44 pm (UTC)It's a great idea for people who think they can't POSSIBLY write a whole book. And in my case it was a great no-pressure way to play with an idea I liked a lot but wasn't confident I could do justice to. Turns out I can write this idea fine, and I'm glad to know it!
no subject
Date: 2007-10-26 04:10 pm (UTC)If someone can make a profit off something, they will.